Both are real estate agents, so apart from the obvious, that one represents the seller and the other looks after the purchaser, what sets them apart?
Well, most selling agents have never been buyers’ agents and a lot of buyers’ agents have never been selling agents, but I have been both and there are some key philosophical and practical differences.
Now, believe it or not, selling agents have a bit of a reputation for over-paying for property. John McGrath, probably Australia’s most famous real estate agent, has a particularly stellar record for losing money on his real estate transactions. Only the other weekend, it was noted in Title Deeds that he “copped a loss on Tallowwood, his weekend retreat at Duffys Forest”. Over the 12 months in which he owned the house he managed to lose nearly $700,000 plus renovation costs. When you add in the stamp duty, whch would have been over $240,000, that’s a million dollar change of mind. Adding insult to injury, he sold another property earlier this year, this time in Walsh Bay, for $45,000 less than he paid for it in 2009. If my memory serves me correctly he also took a bath a few years ago on a Potts point apartment that he “unimproved” by converting it from a three bedder into a giant bachelor pad.
Selling agents simply aren’t as critical as buyers agents. Why is this?
Bryce Holdaway, my partner in crime on Location Location Location Australia, sums up the differences in this way: a selling agent is skilled in marketing and negotiation, a buyers agent is skilled in property selection and negotiation. I can take it a step further. The selling agent doesn’t get to choose what they have to sell. In some cases they list a property that will be very popular but often they list something that is a bit of a challenge. So a good agent will be very skilled at objection handling. They become very adept at seeing the positives and glossing over the negatives. Consequently, they have a cup half full approach to buying property. On the flipside, by casting a critical eye over a prospective purchase, a buyers agent will be more objective when determining what is a good property and then establishing the right price to pay.
Careful of free advice from your friendly agent.
We come across quite a few people who have such a good relationship with their selling agent that they seek out their advice when it comes time to buy. They recognize that they need expert help, which is a great thing, but the selling agent is not the expert that they need. Apart from the fact that their favourite agent views property through different lenses, they are usually receiving free advice. And free advice is worth what you pay for it...
Not that I charge my friends and family for my professional opinion, but I can’t help but notice that those who benefit from our free pearls of wisdom are much less likely to actually take the advice. But our clients, on the other hand, who have made a commitment and paid upfront for access to our expertise, always place a high value on what we tell them.
But, I digress. It is about getting the right person for the job. Let the selling agents stick to selling and the buyers agents stick to buying. That way, when you sell you will get the best price and when you buy, you are more likely to have a property that will be easier for a selling agent to market down the track. That is, there will be less objections that need to be handled.




The thing that is so rarely talked about is risk. Now don’t get me wrong, there is a time and a place for taking risks in the hope of big capital gains. But this is the realm of serious investors who are educated and experienced (or pay for advice) and who already have substantial equity to back them up. It is not an investment strategy that we advise for first time investors or those with a large debt to equity ratio.




Comments
Post has no comments.